Compare ACL reconstruction graft options — patellar tendon, hamstring, quadriceps, and allograft. Recovery, outcomes, and which is right for you.
The patellar tendon graft takes the middle third of your patellar tendon with small bone plugs from your kneecap and shinbone. Pros: Bone-to-bone healing (fastest integration), strongest initial fixation, gold standard for competitive athletes. Cons: Anterior back pain (kneeling discomfort) in 10-20% of patients, slightly higher risk of patellar fracture, donor site pain during recovery.
Uses your semitendinosus and gracilis tendons (inner thigh hamstrings). Pros: Less anterior back pain, smaller incision, less kneeling discomfort, good for non-athletes and recreational athletes. Cons: Slower healing (soft tissue-to-bone, no bone plugs), potential hamstring weakness (usually temporary), slightly higher re-tear rate in young athletes.
Uses a strip of your quadriceps tendon above the kneecap, with or without a bone plug. Pros: Growing in popularity, thick strong graft, less anterior back pain than patellar, good for revision ACL surgery. Cons: Newer technique (less long-term data), potential quad weakness, some surgeons less experienced with this option.
Uses cadaver tissue (patellar tendon, Achilles, or tibialis anterior from a tissue bank). Pros: No donor site pain, shorter surgery, good for older/less active patients, revision cases, or multi-ligament reconstructions. Cons: Higher re-tear rate in young athletes (2-4x higher), disease transmission risk (extremely rare), slower biological incorporation.
Search 73,628 spine surgeons across 50 states.
Find spine surgeons Browse All Procedures